Autoban

After you have edited the source code, post your patch here.
Forum rules
Home | Wiki | Rules

Autoban

Postby ivan386 » 08 Dec 2009 17:01

If in start of comment of rule word "autoban" then peer will be autobaned.
Attachments
Autoban.zip
(13.51 KiB) Downloaded 88 times
Last edited by ivan386 on 17 Sep 2010 18:02, edited 1 time in total.
ivan386
 
Posts: 261
Joined: 17 Jun 2009 14:08

Re: Autoban

Postby mojo85 » 08 Dec 2009 17:52

What funtionality does this add?
mojo85
 
Posts: 115
Joined: 27 Sep 2009 05:35

Re: Autoban

Postby ocexyz » 08 Dec 2009 18:40

+1
If have understood ptoperly: if condition will be fulfilled then guilty source will be banned ?
Last edited by ocexyz on 08 Dec 2009 22:25, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ocexyz
 
Posts: 624
Joined: 15 Jun 2009 13:09

Re: Autoban

Postby ivan386 » 08 Dec 2009 21:12

ivan386
 
Posts: 261
Joined: 17 Jun 2009 14:08

Re: Autoban

Postby cyko_01 » 09 Dec 2009 04:32

interesting, but the word autoban might be more appropriate as the type parameter. these bans will need to expire after about a week
User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Autoban

Postby diztrancer » 09 Dec 2009 08:21

Please, check first autoban in ShareazaPlus.

After Sometime of work in ShareazaPlus you can notice in "Security" tab many rules like xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - "Autoban because of sending bad packets" or "Autoban because using rogue client" and many others.


P.S. Why no to set default minimum file size to for example 5MB ?
User avatar
diztrancer
 
Posts: 222
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:41
Location: Ukraine

Re: Autoban

Postby ivan386 » 09 Dec 2009 10:02

Baned client coment:
Autobaned: trash (REMIX).mp3

Autoban work only for file hits.
ivan386
 
Posts: 261
Joined: 17 Jun 2009 14:08

Re: Autoban

Postby cyko_01 » 09 Dec 2009 14:07

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Autoban

Postby diztrancer » 09 Dec 2009 14:12

Text-based filtering is bad idea at all.

They generated new naming scheme every day automatically :(
User avatar
diztrancer
 
Posts: 222
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:41
Location: Ukraine

Re: Autoban

Postby mojo85 » 09 Dec 2009 19:58

I think spam is an everyday occurrence of keyword based searches ... there is no way of fully stopping it, and most attempts are like a bandaid to a damn that sprung a leak. Now Autobanning based on what rule, under what criteria is someone autobanned? I could see negative results if the rules are vague, leading to a bunch of valid results being banned.

The ultimate solution is a DHT based search. Only hashes will result in a hit of one file you are specifically looking for, the keyword search is when you want a wider scope of searching.

Also maybe the Hub needs to determine that this person is constantly providing a search hit so search requests should not be routed to him because it is a high probability of being a fake.
mojo85
 
Posts: 115
Joined: 27 Sep 2009 05:35

Re: Autoban

Postby cyko_01 » 10 Dec 2009 03:28

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Autoban

Postby old_death » 10 Dec 2009 16:44

User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Autoban

Postby ivan386 » 10 Dec 2009 22:58

In G2 seeds sends hits directly to client or to hub to client conected.
ivan386
 
Posts: 261
Joined: 17 Jun 2009 14:08

Re: Autoban

Postby kevogod » 17 Dec 2009 00:36

kevogod
 
Posts: 278
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:13

Re: Autoban

Postby ailurophobe » 17 Dec 2009 01:56

ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25


Return to Code Submission

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest