Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Post comments about Shareaza code and discuss with other developers.
Forum rules
Home | Wiki | Rules

Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 19 Apr 2011 17:58

User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby ailurophobe » 19 Apr 2011 19:26

The security manager is in kind of an unstable situation... It might be better to revert that commit for beta if one is made. It might be possible to leave the miss cache since it is a minor addition but I am not sure if we can properly test the bigger changes. For example I am not sure if ban user works in the search window. I had some problems with it not working but there is not much point checking the reason for that if OD is still working on rewriting the whole system.
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby cyko_01 » 20 Apr 2011 02:58

I agree with both of you. Honestly, I am surprised that the effects of this bug are not noticeable on the G2 crawler graphs
User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 21 Apr 2011 09:25

User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby ailurophobe » 21 Apr 2011 12:32

I am talking about revision 8920 "submitting ailurophobe's miss cache code and OldDeaths IP filter optimization code for further testing and review", ryo fixed and refactored it but still neither my code nor yours that was committed was really ready for a commit and I am bit dubious if ryo really fixed everything. This code is after all supposed to be fully replaced/merged by the code you are working on.
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 21 Apr 2011 13:14

Trust me, that code really works :)
User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby cyko_01 » 21 Apr 2011 21:16

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 21 Apr 2011 21:55

BTW, I'd like to hear Ryo's opinion within this discussion...
User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby ailurophobe » 22 Apr 2011 11:44

Btw, I did a new "ban user" test and seems it does add the rule for the IP address, it just doesn't clean the hits from the search like it used to. A performance optimization, perhaps?

Anyway, I guess it won't be necessary to revert the code, I totally forgot that cyko would have been "testing" the code in the alphas while making filters.
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 22 Apr 2011 13:16

This seems rather illogical to me, as no matter where the call to the security manager to ban a user IP comes from, the update call to all places where this IP could be used (including searches) should be identical...
User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby cyko_01 » 22 Apr 2011 18:11

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby raspopov » 23 Apr 2011 07:48

So you all thinks that we need a new release soon... :geek:
User avatar
raspopov
Project Admin
 
Posts: 945
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 12:30

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby cyko_01 » 23 Apr 2011 12:42

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby ailurophobe » 23 Apr 2011 12:44

Pretty much. Apparently the "stable" version has a bug that can make G2 pretty much unusable that has been, if not fixed, at least mitigated in the debug builds. If not a new "release" build, a new "beta" that people could be directed to instead of the "latest debug" would be useful. After all the "latest debug" might be arbitrarily unstable or dysfunctional depending on what the last commit was.

That said, with the low number of testers we have, it might be best policy for the project to update the release version relatively fast. There just is not enough of us to stop bugs from making it through to the release, so we might as well focus on making the bug fixes available on auto-update faster.
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby profyler1 » 24 Apr 2011 18:36

" so we might as well focus on making the bug fixes available on auto-update faster."

I like that!!

+1 for the beta release !
profyler1
 
Posts: 39
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 18:35

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 24 Apr 2011 22:00

User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby andhee » 30 Apr 2011 04:24

dying to see new release too :D
User avatar
andhee
 
Posts: 29
Joined: 22 Aug 2009 07:37
Location: Jakarta, ID

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby old_death » 21 May 2011 19:57

Well, I really don't want to press the matter, but we seem to be having a massive decrease of the population of the Gnutella2 network going on ATM. As this might be caused by the future dates bug (which has been fixed in the current debug builds), we should release either an official beta or a stable release to counter this negative effect - the sooner the better.

Have a look at the population drop during the last month:
Image
User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby raspopov » 21 May 2011 20:23

As you see G2 population slightly decreased every May.
User avatar
raspopov
Project Admin
 
Posts: 945
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 12:30

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby kevogod » 21 May 2011 21:54

kevogod
 
Posts: 278
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:13

Re: Shareaza v2.5.4.2 (beta)

Postby profyler1 » 23 May 2011 18:40

I agree to old _death. And we are going to see if it continues to descrease in the next month graphics...

Really, that future dates bug is totally annoying. As i said there is many outhere complaining about it, and they are right. what is the porpouse of using shareaza when the main source (gnutella2) is buggy?
Please release the beta version, or any version that only the specific G2 bug is fixed. I think that this has been delayed quite a lot for now, though that this bug has already a fix in the dev builds. :|
profyler1
 
Posts: 39
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 18:35


Return to Development Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron