[BUG] back from eMule

Discuss Shareaza bugs.
Forum rules
Home | Wiki | Rules

[BUG] back from eMule

Postby ailurophobe » 02 Dec 2009 04:57

I moved back to using Shareaza and noticed some minor things...

1. Importing eMule partials works great in theory, not so well in practice.
The basic problem is that while the file merge method used is pretty much foolproof and works great when it works, it fails without any feedback when no hashset is retrieved. It took me several minutes to figure out why only one of my downloads was imported correctly. An actual new user who had never used "assume complete" or "merge" would IMHO been lost. The merge needs to be modified so it does "assume complete and verify" after Shareaza gets hashset. So instead of failing silently or telling that a hashset is required, it would notify that the operation will be complete after a hashset is acquired. As it is I am stuck waiting for hashset, so I can then manually merge with the eMule partials. While the import is probably pretty rare operation, the flaw here is in the merge logic which is used quite a lot in troubleshooting, so this would be worth fixing.

2. Global search works, but didn't.
The problem is that while there are enough good servers, by default Shareaza will be overwhelmed by bad ones unless you only use a static list, which makes you vulnerable to server changes hiding large parts of the network. The problem went away once I enabled learning new servers and started adding bad server addresses to the security list manually. I think Shareaza should be more aggressive about the global search so it doesn't get stuck on the fakes not responding. Also enabling learning and using a block list seems to work better than using a static list, but I am not sure if there is a good way to implement an updatable blocklist that would cover bad servers. I guess it would require updating the security manager.

3. Adding a torrent still needs work...
I started downloading a torrent of a file I was download from ed2k. This failed because while Shareaza recognized I was already downloading the same file and rejected (correctly) starting a new download, it did not use the tracker data in the torrent. So I was was stuck with "already downloading a torrent" that was not really working as a torrent. I canceled the old download, started the torrent, and merged the old partial to it. (I really love this merge feature...) But this shouldn't be necessary. Shareaza should just add the the torrent info to the download when it actually recognizes it as the same file. In general while Shareaza supports downloads having all possible data, it seems to set the type of the download at the beginning and refuse to add info belonging to another type. Something to do with the way Shareaza links to the torrent info maybe?
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: back from eMule

Postby diztrancer » 02 Dec 2009 10:48

1. You import partials using Tools menu ?

2. Please add this to security list: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=319
This should block 99% of all eDonkey fakes/spam.

3. You always free to add magnet link with tracker to ED2K download :) Please reply if this help.
User avatar
diztrancer
 
Posts: 222
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:41
Location: Ukraine

Re: back from eMule

Postby ailurophobe » 15 Dec 2009 23:16

Yes, the tools menu. But the tool seems to use the merge for actually copying the file and fails if no hashset is available. Maybe it is supposed to copy the hashset from emule and this failed for some reason?
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: back from eMule

Postby dmitryko » 16 Dec 2009 00:49

dmitryko
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 09:59

Re: back from eMule

Postby ailurophobe » 17 Dec 2009 01:39

For me it only totally failed one download. (No explanation was given. I guessed it was just corrupted.) Others I just needed to try several times for the partial data to transfer because it only works after Shareaza has the hashset and it can't have the hashset for all files in time when converting multiple files. Well maybe if you have really fast connection...
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: back from eMule

Postby dmitryko » 19 Dec 2009 20:58

Well, if an operation is potentially time-consuming, some "in-progress" animation would have been greatly apperciated, otherwise it just looks like an application hang with no chance to cancel the import other than program restart. What about printing a dot every 5-10 seconds then concluding the line with "Completed" right in the status window, like many console programs do?
dmitryko
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 09:59


Return to Bugs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest