.lit/.cbr/.cbz

[secgon]

why we can't use these anymore.

[old_death]

There has been no change with these formats. Could you be more precise on what you think has changed so that you can't use these formats anymore?

[secgon]

when i put .lit/.cbr/.cbz in search. i get this message /please re-phrase the search / this search is poorly formatted,and may not function correctly.Searches should include several terms where possible, and specify a schema (file type). furthermore, searches must not be limited to numbers or negative terms only, and you should avoid overly general queries. most clients on the network will ignore a search for all mp3 files, for example because it not specific enough, and would generate too many results. is that specific enough for you this is message i get trying to use .lit/.cbr/.cbz.hope this helps you out.

[ailurophobe]

Just put ".lit" in a search, no problem, even got results (including a bunch of pdf). The problem is not that you use the file extensions in a search, I do it all the time since it helps filtering spam, it is that your overall query is invalid, just like the message says.

[secgon]

in 2.5.4.0 it works fine.it in 2.5.5.0 it won't do the .lit/.cbr/.cbz search.

[ailurophobe]

To verify you are talking about searching for ".lit" (or other extension) without any other terms? (Because as I said my search is working just fine and I am using 2.5.5.0.)

If so, then this is probably a bugfix. Search terms are supposed to have four letters and maybe 2.5.4.0 incorrectly counted "." as a letter instead of a separator. Just a guess.

If not, could you be more specific about the problem since I am not seeing any myself.

[secgon]

read my 2nd post that is what i get when i try using .lit/.cbr/.cbz . it will not use the file look up format anymore.