ed2k wackiness

Get answers to your Shareaza related problems.
Forum rules
Home | Wiki | Rules

ed2k wackiness

Postby grey-hame » 31 May 2010 23:48

If I do a urn:ed2khash:whatever search in Shareaza 2.5.2.0 I get a result named

Your client is too old. Please upgrade to last version !

with a size of 942.22 MB(!), a rating of Fake/Corrupt, and roughly 1000 sources including whichever ed2k hub I'm connected to.

Is this just some wankers sharing a file with this name? If so, why is it showing up on hash searches that it doesn't match? (It showed up on two distinct hash searches and logically it cannot match both.) If it is really an alert that there's a newer version, though, then it's in error, since there is no more recent release (rather than beta) version of Shareaza at this time.

The sources report themselves to be eDonkey2000 itself (not eMule, Shareaza, or any other ed2k client species). The file hash appears to be ed2khash:04730f001faa56662222222222222222 which is not identical to either of the hash searches I've performed that have returned it as a hit.

Advice: ignore? Upgrade something? (If so, what?)
grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: ed2k wackiness

Postby ailurophobe » 01 Jun 2010 13:48

Alerts like these actually refer to versions of the protocol and mean that newer eMule versions have features that the server thinks are important that you don't support. It is possible you just have the feature disabled, though.
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25

Re: ed2k wackiness

Postby grey-hame » 02 Jun 2010 04:18

Features like what? Ones that eMule has and Shareaza 2.5.2.0 does not?
grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: ed2k wackiness

Postby old_death » 02 Jun 2010 09:42

User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: ed2k wackiness

Postby ailurophobe » 02 Jun 2010 19:06

But the warnings usually are due to server protocol features, not the user visible features listed in the Wikipedia article. It is a very clear possibility that you just have the feature the server expects turned off, actually. I think "large file support" at FALSE used to cause this?
ailurophobe
 
Posts: 709
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 05:25


Return to Help and Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest