by cyko_01 » 08 Sep 2009 03:11
ok, that's just the people with mal-intent though. What about the people who do not even realize that they are acting as a hub? what about the people who do not realize that there filters are affecting other users? what about people in countries who need to filter certain content because of the laws there(eg: porn) - content that is perfectly legal elsewhere.
perhaps a better solution would be to have a separate (hard-coded?) less aggressive filterset for hub level filtering.
Also, what about the extra resources that would be required for hubs to filter all these search queries? Would this not give incentive to NOT act as a hub? This goes beyond internet connection speed and enters the realm of computer processing power.
Personally I do not trust anyone else to decide what content I can and can't access. It goes against the basic core principles of net neutrality, and it would ruin the best thing about P2P - your choice to access whatever you want, even if that is spam or viruses. If you want to screw up your own search results that is your problem, but leave mine alone!