Shareaza

>>>
BitBlinder is a new open source project, under which a software application that gives users the anonymity of P2P networks. The project will also allow to circumvent the filters used by the authorities or employers to restrict access to certain pages. The service aims have decent download speed and no fees.

Currently, people who care about anonymity, you may consult the Tor software. It works, however slowly, and the community associated with it does not admit it to the needs of the network BitTorrent. You can also use the VPN service, but it involves the expenditure.

BitBlinder shall be free of these defects. This is an open source project providing "anonymous" software for Windows and Linux. Soon will receive a version for Mac OS X. This software consists of client based on BitTornado BitTorrent and browser based on Firefox (not the version for Linux).

The creators BitBlindera acknowledge that the client BitTornado is not so very rich in features as the other clients, and your browser does not support Flash. It was, however, that, in the use of open source software, whose operation is more transparent than in the case of programs with a code.

The plan is BitBlindera.


BitBlinder in large part based on the known solutions of the Tor software, but a separate network. BitBlindera user who wants to connect to the web page linked to by other members, who provide for him the link. Each agent in the network has data for the previous and the next machine in the chain, you do not have data linking to a specific page. The connection between the intermediaries is encrypted. Next diagram presents a general diagram of operation BitBlindera. (sorry, there is no possibility to aatach this here)

In order to maintain a decent speed, is BitBlinder require that the user who downloaded the X GB of data, had a duty to medium to exchange the same amount of data. At the outset you will be able to download 2 GB of data and a further credit will be awarded only when a tie in well with the broker for others.

Considered is to introduce a pay-version of BitBlinder in which the user can retrieve data without sharing their own bandwidth. The project, however, see no reason not to make available a free version based on the model described above. More detailed information about how BitBlinder is to guarantee anonymity, can be found at the project in the "Learn More".

At this time, the software is available in BitBlinder unstable beta. It remains to be seen how much can be useful to those who depend on the anonymity and free access to Internet sites. It must, however, that the project will be shot in the home, if that is to reach its goals will provide easy to use and free tool providing anonymity.

BitBlinder The software can be downloaded from the project. Using the service requires registration. The project encouraged to send information about errors, in order to rapidly improve the software.
<<<
I place this here as I think if this is open source, this could be either adopted or use idea or parts of code do obtain more anonymyty on G2. Anyway I think this could be interesting also for Flox.

Why you post this shit here? Do you want help to spread for example child pornography even no knowing about what you doing?

ocexyz

Shit counter: 62
Joined: 15 Jun 2009 13:09

this is old news. Posted on TorrentFreak on June 11th, 2009. Flox is long dead and has nothing to do with anonymous file transfers

you downloaded Xgb of malware/trojans/fakes/porno anonymously and you must to upload it anonymously

Question to all: do you really think that such anonymous technique have future ? I think in not so distant future provider will detect anonymous users and disconnect them You anonymous ---> don't have rights to use internet

Your bids ?

I think the time will come when it will be impossible to connect to the internet when you're not anonymous, as the tendency to spy on everything a user does will increase more and more. I am in favour of anonymity, but... if it were up to me to decide, I'd get death penalty back in europe for those who do such things to children... This may sound very drastic, but it's a fact.


Greetings,
Old

OldDeath, you will connect to internet from sewerage/canalization ?

P.S. This world should be destroyed. Be better. Be BORG.

Porn != Pedophilia.

I like porn, but the ones who make such things to children must go to jail.

OldDeath, move this thread to lounge. There we begin collective writing new cyber-punk fiction about anonymously connecting to internet to watch porno

We are in lounge now

This is a non issue. Anybody who knows about how the internet carries data back and forth will know, that anonymous filesharing is nothing more than a myth. These projects only make it more difficult to trace its users, they cant guarantee that you will not be found by somebody who wants to find you. So the guy raving about his software is going to get nowhere on this forum.

History has also shown that credits systems can be manipulated, as anything else with such clearly defined and public rules; people always have a tendency to get 'something for nothing' and can work this system to their advantage to rip off other network users. Hence why no reputable p2p network would go near such a thing.

And finally, you said earlier on in your post that you speak nothing but rhetoric. If that is the case surely you are targeting the wrong crowd? People around here are not looking to hide the data they download for any other reason than usual privacy. They are therefore not interested in 'hiding the truth' because even if they did hide it perfectly: it still doesnt change the fact of them either they did something illegal or they didnt.

I guess what I am saying is that even if your system could offer total anonimity - it would be of no use: People have to live with themselves and you cant hide from your own vices, so that kind of rhetoric is uneccessary. People who want anonimity don't need canvassing. Furthermore it would probably be in their interests to make a little less fuss, as they will only attract negative attention to themselves and just end up getting banned.

Wow about 20 replies came in there before I could post! Dude .....

It surprises me how this is still viewed as an argument! Surely it is just logic -

For data transfer to happen over the internet, a connection must be made where each node knows its own location and the location of the target in relation to itself. And whatever else you include with the initial payload of each packet of data (namely the location of where the packet is headed, and where originated from; the basic things each packet must contain to be able to reach its target location and give a forwarding address) if you remove or modify these locations then the packet becomes unreliable. In other words you cannot say for sure if it will reach its target location, and even saying it does - it may not be able to provide the forwarding address for the target client to reply to.

So realistically unless we can devise some method of transport that avoids having to route traffic (as the internet must to be able to locate its services and respond with webpages) we can never be truly anonymous. end of debate unless somebody can defy logic...

Gov's who implements XXX-laws (3 strikes you're out, the 'XXX' is for to stay on topic about pr0n ) makes anonP2P and F2F (Friend to Friend) more interesting.

Simply said, if in a country, applies a XXX-law, most users will switch to encrypted / anonym p2p or f2f. Quite harder to investigate whois sharing what. The only solution which could 'break' this new generation of file sharing / p2p is prevent / remove the freedom of communication and speech. Not a big change that it will happen.

So I think, if the govs and industries keeps busy the way they now do, anonP2P and F2F are the future.

Then sth else will be invented. Or perhaps they will not want to cut off their clients.

Well... get us more devs and G2 will get protocol obfuscation and encryption... this will not grant anonymity, but it will at least make it harder to block G2 network traffic.

anonymous P2P is a tricky thing. In order for anyone to connect to you they need an IP address you can be contacted at. This is simply how the internet works, there is no way around it. if someone has your IP address (even if it is dynamic) it can be traced to you. The only thing we can do is make them uncertain that you are the one downloading it by proxying traffic through the network. Unfortunately, this this is that it creates a lot of unnecessary network traffic and hurts the network

No. In this case, you can easily check by downloading the same file twice, or 3 times, if the same sources are present. in order to grant security, you need to tunnel all of transfers at least once in order to not to let the receiver know at least the majority/almost all of the sources for a downloaded file.