New, buggy behavior observed.

Get answers to your Shareaza related problems.
Forum rules
Home | Wiki | Rules

New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 25 Mar 2010 22:19

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 25 Mar 2010 22:20

Looks like your forum's software's gone on the blink again. Now the list and list-item tags are unrecognized.

Update: seems to be fixed now.
Last edited by grey-hame on 25 Mar 2010 23:06, edited 1 time in total.
grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 25 Mar 2010 22:29

Information on the real WMA:Wimad

Trojan.Downloader.WMA.Wimad
Spreading: medium
Damage: high
Size: aprox 3 Mb
Discovered: 2008 Jun 17

The file could have any extension that Windows Media Player can handle such as ".wma", ".asf", ".wmw" , or others.

Basically the user runs the file in Windows Media Player and gets a browser window that prompts him to download a file named "Codec.exe" .

This is actually an exploit of the media files because its an available feature in stead of an attack to the format.


So, this is a false positive; whereas the wma/asf family of file formats can contain scripts as an "available feature" there's no possiblity of a jpeg hosting a macro virus or similarly. The Joint Photographic Experts Group is smarter than Microsoft, who really should have learned their lesson after the Word-infecting "concept" virus back in the 90s, yet continued to make Office versions that were vulnerable and then made proprietary audio and video formats that were vulnerable.

Furthermore, there's no way for a 3 MB virus to fit inside a 14KB JPEG. I don't care how advanced the compression technology gets, there are information-theoretic laws that make it impossible in this case; the 3 MB virus surely contains way more than 14KB of Kolmogorov complexity any way you slice it.
grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby cyko_01 » 25 Mar 2010 22:48

don't over-complicate things. This is most-likely not a bug. Chances are that you are just downloading the same spam file with different titles and/or you keep connecting to the same bad peer, or group of peers. This is why the file does not verify. The file does not get moved to your downloads folder, therefore it is not removed from your search results. Even if it does, it will still show up as being on your downloads list unless you close that search and start another one. this also explains why the file is "overwritten" - because it is never actually in your downloads folder and is still on your downloads list.

If you think the file is legit then check if there is any metadata - height, width, colors - listed for it (is the details panel empty). If there is data there then you should be able to "forget all known sources" (right-click > properties > actions). If the file does not have any metadata then there is a chance that it is spam(I have yet to see spam results with metadata). Make sure that you have a good anti-spam filter and that it is properly installed.
User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 25 Mar 2010 23:19

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby cyko_01 » 26 Mar 2010 22:41

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 27 Mar 2010 03:18

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby cyko_01 » 27 Mar 2010 13:25

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 27 Mar 2010 19:31

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby siavoshkc » 28 Mar 2010 23:22

siavoshkc
 
Posts: 347
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 09:37

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 29 Mar 2010 11:05

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby siavoshkc » 29 Mar 2010 11:39

siavoshkc
 
Posts: 347
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 09:37

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 29 Mar 2010 22:47

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby sshanu » 30 Mar 2010 08:33

sshanu
 
Posts: 58
Joined: 14 Jun 2009 06:22
Location: Australia

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby siavoshkc » 30 Mar 2010 09:27

OK grey-hame, if you want to be helpful, report symptoms and leave the conclusion to others.
siavoshkc
 
Posts: 347
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 09:37

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 31 Mar 2010 02:30

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby old_death » 31 Mar 2010 09:18

User avatar
old_death
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:19

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby grey-hame » 31 Mar 2010 14:55

grey-hame
 
Posts: 189
Joined: 08 Aug 2009 19:47

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby cyko_01 » 31 Mar 2010 22:30

User avatar
cyko_01
 
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 15:51

Re: New, buggy behavior observed.

Postby kevogod » 01 Apr 2010 02:54

kevogod
 
Posts: 278
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 16:13


Return to Help and Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron